Spotlight on Roger Federer and Novak Djokovic in US Open
He was past his 30th birthday, they would point out.
About 2 years went by without any additions to his Grand Slam trophy case, the thinking went.
First Rafael Nadal, then Novak Djokovic, overtook Federer in the rankings and as the man to beat at major tournament after major tournament.
Well, look at the guy now. Wimbledon champion, once again, stretching his record total to 17 Grand Slam championships. Ranked No. 1, once again. And -- heading into Monday's start of the US Open -- the favourite to reach the final, once again.
"I'm out of the business of predicting Federer anymore," said Andre Agassi, a two-time US Open champion and runner-up to Federer in 2005.
"He's continually surprised me with his achievements; he no longer surprises me. He has a lot more tennis in him. He looked as comfortable as I've ever seen him on the tennis court in England. He maybe needs one or two things to fall for him to knock down a few more (Grand Slam titles) at this stage of his career, but he's certainly as capable of it as anybody I've ever seen."
Federer's pursuit of a sixth US Open title at age 31 will certainly be among the main angles to keep track of on the hard courts of Flushing Meadows.
"Something is going to happen, for sure, because something always happens to me at the Open, whether it's a horrendous line call that's 2 feet in or whether it's a grunt and I get a point penalized or a foot-fault when I actually don't foot-fault. I'm prepared for something to happen," said the younger Williams sister, a three-time champion in New York whose serve was dominant recently en route to her fifth title at Wimbledon and two gold medals at the Olympics.
Another key question is what sort of effect there will be from the short turnaround and shift to hard courts after the grass-court London Games.
"There's no doubt about it: This is not an ideal preparation," said Federer, routed 6-2, 6-1, 6-4 by Murray in the Olympic final on Aug. 5, less than a month after beating him in four sets on the same court in the Wimbledon final.
"It's not impossible," Federer added, "but it's just very hard on the body and mind to travel halfway around the world, go on a different surface. ... In the past, you would take maybe a few weeks off for a top player, then prepare for three brutal weeks on hard courts, then come over here wanting to fire (on) all cylinders. This year, it's different."
He once won 40 matches in a row at the US Open, a streak that ended with a five-set loss to Juan Martin del Potro in the 2009 final. That was followed by semifinal setbacks against Djokovic each of the past two years, including what Federer calls "that brutal match with Novak" -- in 2011, when Federer took the first two sets, then held two match points, but couldn't close the deal.
On the first match point, Djokovic smacked a gutsy forehand return winner that barely landed on a line and drew something of a rebuke from Federer afterward.
"I never played that way," Federer said at the time. "I believe in the hard-work's-going-to-pay-off kind of thing, because early on, maybe I didn't always work at my hardest. So for me, this is very hard to understand how (he could) play a shot like that on match point."
Djokovic went on to victory in the final against Nadal, the 2010 US Open champion and 11-time major winner who is currently out with knee problems and won't be in New York. That was part of a stretch in which the Serb and the Spaniard split up nine Grand Slam trophies in a row, shutting out Federer and leaving him stuck on No. 16 for more than two full seasons.
Given how rare it is for a man past 30 to remain in the upper echelon of tennis -- a not-quite-31 Federer was the oldest Wimbledon champion since Arthur Ashe in 1975 -- and the ascension of a couple of rivals in their mid-20s, there were plenty of whispers that the Swiss superstar might be finished.
A man who reached a record 10 consecutive major finals from 2005-07, then another eight in a row from 2008-10, suddenly was losing the occasional Grand Slam quarterfinal.
What, after all, was left to motivate him? What could drive him to keep up?
Djokovic and Nadal, to name two, never doubted Federer would reassert himself.
"He was always there," Djokovic said. "Last couple years, he didn't win a major, but he was in a couple of finals and always semifinals. He's always playing close matches against whoever."
Federer beat Djokovic in the Wimbledon semifinals, then topped Murray for triumph No. 7 at the All England Club, tying Pete Sampras and William Renshaw (who played in the 1880s) for the most in history. That also allowed Federer to return to No. 1 and, a week later, break Sampras' career record for most time atop the ATP rankings.
Continuing what he termed "a magical summer for me," Federer earned his first individual Olympic medal. Then he showed he can still turn up big on hard courts, winning a record-equalling 21st career Masters title last weekend, holding serve throughout the tournament and beating Djokovic in the final.
Federer, Djokovic and Nadal have combined to win 29 of the past 30 Grand Slam titles (del Potro is the only interloper in that span, which began in 2005).
Murray has been on the outside looking in, but there are suspicions that his success at the Olympics could be a harbinger of what's to come.
"Come the US Open, I hope this will have given me the confidence to go there and believe in myself a bit more than I have in the past," Murray said at the Olympics, "and give myself a shot at winning there."
It also means he already owns one of this season's top five prizes; Djokovic won the Australian Open in January, and Nadal won the French Open in June, before Federer re-emerged at Wimbledon.
"It is interesting that three different guys have won three different majors this year, plus Andy the gold," Federer said. "It definitely sets a great tone for the US Open, there's no doubt about that."
With Nadal sidelined, and Murray still waiting to win a major final, Federer and Djokovic appear set to take centrestage at the US Open.
At the very least, Federer is firmly back at the forefront.
Supreme Court on Friday pronounced that Sunil Gavaskar will replace N Srinivasan to take up the post of interim president of the BCCI. The S... More Supreme Court on Friday pronounced that Sunil Gavaskar will replace N Srinivasan to take up the post of interim president of the BCCI. The Supreme Court gave three interim orders to the BCCI, that is, Rajasthan Royals and Chennai Super Kings will not take part in IPL 7 tournament, Gavaskar replacing Srinivasan, and all India Cements employess be removed from BCCI.
Date 27-03-14, Duration 1:52, Views 317